Since the 2015 US election and 2016 Brexit referendum upsets, foreign influence on democratic elections has become a hot topic. On John Oliver’s The other day Tonight, a segment explained the tranquility of tampering with voting machines which inspired me to publish this short article. Before I recieve into how simple and inexpensive it really is to propagate disinformation on the net, I’d like provide some background on why and just how more nations will likely be entering the digital warfare space inside the future years.
Foundations of Geopolitics, a novel drafted with the International Department of the Russian Ministry of Defence last 1997, led the way like a philosophical instructions manual for dismantling and dethroning enemies and super-powers alike, with the ultimate aim of “Finlandization” like Europe. Based on Wikipedia’s summary around the strategy:
“Military operations play relatively little role. The textbook advocates a sophisticated program of subversion, destabilization, and disinformation spearheaded through the Russia special services.”
Throughout the 2015 US election with a meagre monthly budget of just $1.25M (estimated $15M each year), Russia’s Internet Research Agency was able to give you the US election towards the Republican Party. With regards to return-on-investment (ROI), Russia spends $36M per Mi-35 helicopter. It’s no surprise then, that as Russia gains more territory and influence, its actual military spending is decreasing.
Military power is clearly an extremely costly ongoing expense where destabilization is pretty cheap and plentiful. But exactly how is that this done?
Tactic 1: Find The Fractures Then Divide & Conquer
While using instance of america, this fracturing tactic was exquisitely executed by fuelling instability and actively supporting all dissident groups simultaneously to inflame tensions and divide communities. Enemies of america happen to be fanning the flames of white nationalism, gun rights groups, stoking anti-immigration sentiment as well as the vilification of refugees and Muslims happen to be most visible. Yet this only scratches the counter.
But more subtle and vicious domestic attacks have been around in support of fringe along with other right-wing religious groups attacking women’s reproductive rights, gay marriage equality, homelessness and mental health.
There has been generational divisiveness growing between Seniors and Millennials. There exists a growing demonization of environmental stewardship (see baseless attacks and also other trolling of Greta Thunberg) and attacks on democratically-held values generally speaking.

Long-term, inter-generational damage from the exploitation of those existing divides is seen from the gutting of america education system, diminishing access to healthcare for many, ballooning deficits that our children and grandchildren will be saddled down by some of the long-term consequences to be felt by this surprisingly inexpensive destabilization warfare technique.
What were once cracks in an overarching national unity have become red line fractures within an artificially created, cold civil war. The majority are now asking what was implemented to exploit these existing social divides?
Tactic 2: Leverage digital age intersection between behavioural economics, social networking loopholes along with the relative simplicity of internet search engine exploitation
Being a digital strategist an internet-based marketer We’ve observed that many of the tactics accessible to civilians were modified to get weaponized against competing nations. Boosting social websites reach on divisive posts and influencers gave fringe groups an incorrect sense they held popular yet controversial views.
Social media has several loopholes that i often share to my web marketer followings so they can have more bang for their buck with clients. It’s donrrrt forget to remember social websites platforms’ #1 goal is always to make you stay on the platform as long as possible so they can make ad revenue. They do this by showing you content they are could keep your self on a little bit longer. They are all literally designed at some level being addictive to all of us.
I discuss during my marketing content various exploitation opportunties that trick these social platforms into thinking your posts is viral by fooling the algorithm they depend upon to distribute to users.
For instance, with below $100 I will buy 10,000 twitter followers, automatically getting 1,000 retweets and favourites on 10 posts. For $100 of paid ads on twitter, you barely have any results. That’s because Twitter under-reports bot activity in order to convince its shareholders that website engagement is growing. It’s not simply Twitter – Facebook, Instagram, Youtube (Google), Snapchat and even Linkedin all have the same fundamental vulnerability. It has become very easy to offer false social proof to just about anything.
Humans are hardwired with cognitive biases which are easily and frequently exploited by social media marketing platforms and look engines to make us believe that everything is more (or fewer) popular than they truly are. Increasingly we seem to be getting stuck within our own social echo chambers and believe a lot of people see things exactly like us.
There are legitimate grievances across the US economy like job losses from globalization and artificial intelligence causing increased economic inequality. But Us residents were manipulated and sentiment hijacked by populist narratives for being the victim with the government, elites, experts, Democrats, Mexicans, Muslims, and foreign allies.
Tactic 3: Erode Trust & Global Alliances
What’s worse, not just was the thing achieved to destabilize america by facilitating the turning of an nation on itself, but in addition have its internal damage bleed Anti-Americanism into US-global relations. The surprise betrayal with the American-Kurd alliance may have lasting consequences on American credibility, leaving American soldiers and civilians more prone than in the past.
France, the foremost and the oldest international ally of america, has become questioning how much it may depend on the united states as soon as the abrupt pulling people forces from Northern Syria without the consultations from NATO partners. As reported by the BBC,
“Russia, which sees Nato being a threat to its security, welcomes the French president’s comments as “truthful words.””
It’s hard to say when exactly this second Cold War started, just one thing is for sure: we’re woefully happy to defend ourselves from disinformation and also have learned to avoid difficult political conversations.

To learn more about election hacking tactics please visit web page: click for more.